Simultaneously, Christian Louboutin has nailed the comfort of a regular pump, the security of a bootie, and infused the unapologetic sexiness of a cutout sandal. Full-coverage with no appeal spared, no frump to be found – it’s also no surprise this deep-V shoe is called the Creve Coeur ($795). That’s French for “heartbreak,” and as much as it breaks mine to not buy it, this is ultimately a basic shoe that isn’t worth the dent in your wallet.
Especially when Diane von Furstenberg’s Zia sandal ($280) serves the same purpose. Plus, with a stretchy sling-back and suede construction, you can expect comfort and flexibility. The price tag is as easy as the wear.
This just proves that sometimes – actually, lots of times – spending less doesn’t mean you’re sacrificing style. In this case, you’re even gaining a rainbow of options. The crisscross platform also comes in sunny mustard and cobalt blue, so why not? At this price, go ahead and have some fun.
Spending less may not mean that you are sacrificing style necessarily, that is another debate in itself….but when you compare the 2 shoes above there is no comparison to me. The CL shoe is more sophisticated and beautiful by far ….and a basic shoe is worthy of the extra $$$ as it will be in style for years to come.
I own a few DVF shoes, and they are actually very comfortable, stylish and so far no issues with the quality. I also like the CL, but the heel is not as high as the DVF, and it doesn’t have a platform so its more uncomfortable and not as high. I’ll just stay with my <3 DVF's!!
I’ve had two pairs of DVF shoes, and will never buy another…they are not well made (at least those that I purchased). One pair fell apart the first day I wore them. Figuring it was just a flaw, I exchanged them for another pair of the same shoe, and again…fell apart on the first wear. I tried a totally different style, and they lasted slightly longer…about 2 months. I’d save up and go for the CL’s.