We are deeply disturbed by the news that Selma Blair will be the new spokesmodel for Chanel. I’m sorry Karl, but you are losing your touch. Your touch of reality, that is. I mean, there is nothing interesting about her except that her face is lopsided. Well, we’ll give her one thing, she is edgy, her face is full of edges.
“I saw her at the bar at Border Grill, and she’s even less impressive in person. I just don’t understand this choice.” Comment by CrankyBiscuit
“From Nicole to Selma? Bad.” Comment by Paz
“I hate her. I never understood Karl’s fascination with her. She’s replacing Kate and Vanessa Paradis? WHATEVER!!!” Comment by Cherry
I saw her at the bar at Border Grill, and she’s even less impressive in person. I just don’t understand this choice.
from nicole to selma? bad.
selma is a client of mine and hangs out with that irritating blonde, claire danes, folks…here;s a thought…better selma than claire!
and better Chloe Sevigny than Selma…you guessed it, Chanel is targeting the indie crowd right now… Someone? Anyone? quick!!! CALL Winona Ryder!
you people need to all get over yourselves. i can’t believe there are people who are actually as pretentious as you. you make me sick
What are you all talking about? Selma Blair is beautiful! Vanessa Paradis is freakish looking, IMO. and Nicole, bleh. Puhlease!
We all have our opinions, and we have our own ideas of what is “beautiful” I guess. I really just can’t see how you can say Selma is not as attractive as the others you mention. she may not have the too-skinny, too-pale, bizarre facial features look like they all do, but she can carry off Chanel just as well, if not better.
Just my opinion, of course.
at least shes not as ugly as you